Talk:Plandemic II - Indoctornation

I Also Had Watched The First Plandemic Film And Then Looked Up The Fact Checking Articles You Mentioned
User:Voller - Great initial attempt at Sensemaking the second Plandemic film. I'm afraid I haven't yet watched the second one (and probably won't). After watching the first Plandemic film I thought "If this is true, it's very big", so did some extra research. I found some fact checking articles like the one you found at https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/the-falsehoods-of-the-plandemic-video/ which introduced enough scepticism about Judy Mikovit's claims to make me doubt the trustworthiness of some of the other aspects of the film. Still not enough to dismiss the whole film though. Interested to see your first point on this page saying pretty much the same thing about the Fact Checking articles being important. When I spoke to someone about this I said that on the one hand you probably shouldn't dismiss an entire film because of some incorrect / misleading things in the film, but on the other hand: if you are making a film which is going to be claiming something very controversial (and conspiracy themed) then you should make sure everything in the film is bullet proof, otherwise it's instantly going to be shot down and discredited. It doesn't look like they did that. From what you are saying, it sounds like they didn't have much in the way of a defence against these fact checking article claims, which further increases my doubt in their claims. Looking at the fact checking article on Mikovits now, at https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/plandemic-mikovits-arrest/, it looks even less likely that she is telling the whole truth during this film. Shalsey (talk)